 |
| Thursday, December 08, 2005 |
| hands clean. |
yes, i actually read the Trump Blog...he has some interesting words most of the time. Anyway, he posted about Nick and Jessica's split and spoke about the responsibility and consideration that a prenup offers, unromanticism aside.
I've always thought a prenup is not necessarily a bad thing. It may seem pessimistic initially but it is basically protection for both parties. Sure, it may seem as if you're already foreseeing the possibility of the end of the marriage but if you think that it's strong enough as it is, what's a piece of paper going to matter? I'm sure tons of people have their opinions about it and even my point of view can propose opposing arguments as well but overall, i just don't think it's harmful to have one.
I think that romance and the ever encompassing "till death do us part" is a promise you make in a church. That's your wedding. That's a promise to God and to yourselves. But then we also end up signing some legal document that binds us...the prenup is simply an addendum to that right? why sign a legal document in the first place? because we know that there is another world we live in...where we need a piece of paper to justify our commitment to one another. So if anything should happen to this parchment of partnership, the prenup pacifies any postmortem dispute. doncha just love alliteration? hehe.
Better to just live together for a few years before getting married. but that's another long debate...
hands clean by alanis morisette |
posted by maldita @ 9:24 AM
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
